How Southland Conference Television Network Changed the Game for Smaller Conferences

By Cheval John | Vallano Media
This article was created with the assistance of artificial intelligence.
The final version was reviewed, edited and fact-checked by the author


Graphics created with AI-assisted design tools.
Visual concepts, editorial direction, composition, and final creative decisions were developed by Vallano Media.

For decades, college sports television followed a familiar hierarchy.

The biggest conferences received the biggest opportunities.

Their football and basketball games filled national television schedules, increasing exposure for universities and strengthening already recognizable brands.

Smaller conferences faced a different challenge.

They could have competitive teams, passionate supporters and compelling stories, but getting those games in front of viewers was more difficult.

National television provided opportunities, but smaller conferences could not depend on major networks to show everything they wanted their fans to see.

The Southland Conference decided to build another option.

In 2008, it launched the Southland Conference Television Network, creating an in-house television operation that would run through 2014.

Southland was not operating without major media relationships.

ESPN was already a conference partner.

Instead, Southland added its own television operation to increase distribution and showcase its member institutions.

The conference was not waiting for television to solve its visibility problem.

It was helping solve the problem itself.

Build Where Your Audience Already Exists

Launching a television network required Southland to take on responsibilities normally associated with media companies.

Games had to be selected and produced.

Broadcast crews and on-air talent were needed.

Affiliates had to be secured.

Sponsors needed inventory.

Fans needed to know when and where they could watch.

For a conference without the resources of college athletics’ largest leagues, trying to create a national network would have been unrealistic.

Southland instead concentrated on something it understood well: its geographic audience.

When the network launched, the conference assembled television affiliates in markets including Houston, Baton Rouge, Shreveport, Alexandria, Lake Charles, Little Rock and Tyler.

Those markets were connected to Southland institutions and their supporters.

Rather than asking how to convince everyone in America to watch Southland athletics, the conference could answer a much more practical question:

How do we make our games easier to watch for people who already have a reason to care?

The strategy grew.

By 2011, Southland said its television network had expanded to 21 markets with a potential reach of approximately 10 million television households, particularly across its Texas, Louisiana and Arkansas footprint.

It was a straightforward regional media strategy: identify the core audience, serve it well and expand from there.

Video Courtesy of Southland Conference YouTube Channel

Regional Television Was Only Part of the Plan

Southland did not limit itself to local television stations.

Selected programming received broader distribution through Fox College Sports, giving the conference exposure outside its primary regional markets.

The conference was also experimenting with another form of distribution that would eventually transform sports media: Streaming.

In 2008, live Southland Television Network game broadcasts were also simulcast through SLC NOW, the conference’s online video and audio service.

That does not mean Southland invented the streaming strategy that dominates sports today.

Other organizations were also experimenting with online video as broadband technology improved.

But Southland was using the tools available at the time in a way that looks remarkably familiar today.

Regional television reached the conference’s core markets.

Fox College Sports provided broader distribution for selected programming.

SLC NOW offered an internet option.

The technology has changed dramatically since 2008, but the underlying idea has not: Meet your audience where it is.

The network also gave Southland more opportunities to determine which stories received attention.

In addition to live competition, programming such as Inside the Southland Conference provided another way to showcase the league, its athletes and member institutions.

Southland did not need to become ESPN.

It needed more ways to reach Southland fans.

Then the Media Landscape Changed

By 2015, Southland’s distribution strategy was ready for another change.

This part of the history is important because ESPN did not suddenly discover Southland after the conference spent six years operating its own television network.

The two organizations already had a relationship.

When Southland announced a new five-year multimedia agreement with ESPN in July 2015, the conference described it as its third consecutive five-year agreement with ESPN.

The new arrangement expanded ESPN’s role, including first-selection rights to Southland home events, as digital distribution became increasingly important to college athletics.

There is no documented evidence that operating the Southland Conference Television Network directly caused ESPN to expand its agreement.

There does not need to be.

The network’s accomplishments stand on their own.

From 2008 through 2014, Southland’s in-house operation produced more than 170 unique sports and promotional telecasts.

Its distribution ultimately reached a potential audience exceeding 13 million television households.

The conference built an affiliate network around its geographic footprint, gained additional distribution through Fox College Sports and streamed its broadcasts through SLC NOW.

When the media environment changed, Southland changed with it.

A Platform Is a Tool, Not the Mission

That transition provides perhaps the most useful business lesson from the entire story.

Organizations sometimes become attached to something because they built it themselves.

But owning your distribution does not mean you must own every part of it forever.

The Southland Conference Television Network made sense in the environment in which it was created.

It provided additional access to games and gave the conference more control over how its institutions were presented.

As digital sports distribution expanded, partnering more extensively with ESPN offered another path.

Southland adapted.

That does not make the television network a failure, nor does the ESPN agreement retroactively prove the network was a success.

It demonstrates something simpler:

A platform is a tool, not the mission.

The platform was the Southland Conference Television Network.

The mission was finding better ways to connect Southland athletics with the people who wanted to watch it.

Businesses face similar decisions.

A company might initially build its own technology before eventually adopting a larger platform.

A creator might develop an independent audience before partnering with a media company.

A small business might sell directly to customers before adding a national distributor.

Changing the method does not necessarily mean abandoning the strategy.

Sometimes it means the strategy is evolving.

Know Who You Are Trying to Reach

Southland’s regional approach provides another lesson that remains relevant well beyond college athletics.

Not every organization needs everyone.

Southland did not need the television audience of the SEC or Big Ten for its network to create value.

It needed to reach people with a connection to Southland institutions.

The same principle applies to smaller businesses and independent media organizations.

Growth does not always begin by chasing the largest possible audience.

Sometimes it begins by serving a smaller, clearly defined audience exceptionally well.

Southland understood where its natural audience lived and built distribution around it.

Then it expanded where opportunities made sense.

Final Thoughts

The Southland Conference Television Network lasted only six years, but longevity is not the only measure of whether a strategy mattered.

Southland identified a problem: its institutions needed more visibility and its fans needed more opportunities to watch them.

The conference responded by producing its own broadcasts, developing regional television relationships, expanding selected programming through Fox College Sports and streaming games through SLC NOW.

Then the marketplace changed.

Southland changed with it.

That is what makes this story relevant nearly two decades later.

Organizations do not control every opportunity available to them.

They do control whether they simply wait for those opportunities or find creative ways to build something themselves.

Build what makes sense to build.

Know the audience you are trying to serve.

Partner where partnership creates greater reach.

And when the marketplace changes, be willing to change with it.

The Southland Conference Television Network disappeared.

The strategy behind it never really did.


Graphics created with AI-assisted design tools.
Visual concepts, editorial direction, composition, and final creative decisions were developed by Vallano Media.


Discover more from

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Tags: , ,

About Cheval John

Cheval John serves as Managing Director of Vallano Media, LLC, where he oversees company's editorial strategy, business development and digital media operations. Operating at the intersection of social media management and sports, Vallano Media is building a dual-pillar brand that does two things: deliver real growth for businesses and translate the sports strategies into practical business lessons. Cheval hosted "What's The Word?" a podcast about finding out what inspires people to choose their respective careers and how social media impacted their lives and business from 2013 to 2017. He has spoken at Social Media Week Lima in Ohio and at Social Media Day Houston 2017. He was named a Houston Top 25 Social Media Power Influencer (2016 and 2017) and Twitter (Now X)Top 50 Influencer by Onalytica in 2018.

We Welcome Your Comments