How the ACC Network Built Its Business Before It Ever Launched
By Cheval John | Vallano Media
This article was created with the assistance of artificial intelligence.
The final version was reviewed, edited and fact-checked by the author
Graphics created with AI-assisted design tools.
Visual concepts, editorial direction, composition, and final creative decisions were developed by Vallano Media.
When the ACC Network officially launched on August 22, 2019, fans finally had a 24-hour television home dedicated to Atlantic Coast Conference athletics.
The new channel joined an increasingly important group of conference-specific media networks, offering live competition, studio programming, documentaries, analysis and year-round ACC coverage.
To many viewers, August 22 was the beginning.
From a business perspective, however, the ACC Network had been under construction for years.
The Atlantic Coast Conference and ESPN did not wait until the television channel was ready before developing the infrastructure and digital presence behind it.
Instead, the rollout began years earlier, providing member schools with time to develop production capabilities while giving fans considerably more ACC content through ESPN’s digital platforms.
That makes the ACC Network an interesting business case beyond college athletics.
Sometimes the smartest way to launch something new is to start building the system around it before the finished product ever reaches the public.
The Network Started Digitally
The strategy became public in July 2016, when the ACC and ESPN announced plans for a dedicated ACC Network scheduled to launch in 2019.
But there was another important part of that announcement.
ACC Network Extra, or ACCNX, would begin in August 2016 through ESPN’s digital platforms.
The ACC described the digital service as the “initial phase” of the eventual ACC Network.
That distinction matters.
The ACC wasn’t announcing a television network and then asking fans to wait three years for something to happen.
The digital component of the strategy was beginning almost immediately.
At launch, ACC Network Extra was expected to carry more than 600 exclusive live events, with that inventory growing as the conference moved closer to the television network’s debut.
Fans could find ACC competition that extended well beyond the football and men’s basketball games traditionally associated with major college sports television.
Baseball, softball, volleyball, soccer and numerous Olympic sports could become part of a much larger digital inventory.
For fans, that meant more opportunities to follow their schools.
For the conference and its universities, it meant something else: they had three years to develop experience producing the enormous amount of programming a conference network would eventually require.
Streaming Became Part of the Foundation
ACC Network Extra gave member institutions years of experience producing live events before the linear network arrived.
That experience became increasingly important as August 2019 approached.
ESPN worked with school production staffs in preparation for the demands of the new network, with Sports Video Group reporting at the time of the launch that ESPN had spent roughly 18 months training personnel across the conference.
Schools weren’t simply waiting for ESPN to arrive with television trucks every time an event needed to be produced.
The campuses themselves were becoming an important part of the production system.
That changed the scale of what the ACC could offer.
A conference with numerous universities and dozens of sports could produce far more programming if production capabilities existed throughout the conference instead of being concentrated in one central location.
Streaming therefore represented more than another place to put games.
It became part of the infrastructure behind the eventual television network.
Every Stream Increased Familiarity
There was another potential benefit to starting digitally.
Every streamed baseball game, volleyball match, soccer contest or other ACC event gave fans another opportunity to interact with conference athletics through ESPN’s digital ecosystem.
We should be careful not to claim that ACC Network Extra automatically created the audience that later watched ACC Network.
Public evidence does not establish that direct causal relationship.
What we can say is that the conference had an established digital product years before the linear channel debuted.
That meant the ACC Network wasn’t arriving in 2019 without a digital history behind it.
Fans had already been offered hundreds of ACC events through ACCNX, while universities had accumulated years of experience creating that programming.
The television network would eventually make the ACC’s media operation much larger.
But the foundation was already being built.
Building the Network Before Turning It On
While fans watched ACC events online, another transformation was taking place behind the scenes.
ACC campuses were becoming production centers.
Every Campus Became Part of the Network
Launching a national sports network required considerably more than building a studio at ESPN headquarters.
Member institutions needed the ability to contribute live programming themselves.
Universities invested in cameras, control rooms, replay systems, graphics technology, connectivity and other equipment necessary for producing broadcasts.
Those facilities helped create a distributed production operation capable of supporting the enormous programming inventory envisioned for ACC Network and ACC Network Extra.
The investments also had an educational benefit.
Students interested in broadcasting, journalism, communications and sports media could gain hands-on experience working on live productions.
The ACC later highlighted student employment opportunities among the benefits created by the network, while individual universities developed production environments where students could learn alongside professionals.
That makes the campus component especially interesting from a business standpoint.
The ACC wasn’t merely expanding distribution.
It was developing production capacity throughout its organization.
Building Excitement Before Launch Day
As August 2019 approached, ESPN increased promotion of the new network.
Programming announcements introduced viewers to studio shows, documentaries, football coverage and other original content.
The network’s launch week was promoted as an event itself, culminating with the channel going live at 7 p.m. Eastern on August 22.
But having programming ready did not solve one of the biggest challenges facing any television network.
Fans still needed a way to receive it.
The Distribution Battle
Distribution became one of the most visible business stories surrounding the ACC Network’s launch.
ESPN negotiated with cable, satellite and streaming providers to add the channel to their services.
Some agreements were secured well ahead of launch, while others came remarkably close to opening night.
Charter Communications reached an agreement that brought ACC Network to Spectrum customers on August 14, 2019—only eight days before launch.
And the distribution story didn’t end when the channel went live.
Cox Communications announced an agreement to carry ACC Network on September 4, almost two weeks after the network had debuted.
For some fans, therefore, August 22 wasn’t necessarily the day they gained access.
That provides one of the clearest business lessons in the entire story.
Content and distribution are separate problems.
You can create a strong product, build infrastructure and generate interest, but customers still need a practical way to reach what you’re selling.
A Long-Term Investment
The ACC Network required investments throughout the conference.
Universities developed production facilities and expanded their broadcasting capabilities.
ESPN committed resources to programming, production, talent, promotion and distribution.
The ACC later said the network produced increased revenue distributions for its institutions, but the broader value proposition went beyond one revenue figure.
The network provided another platform for ACC athletics, expanded the conference’s programming inventory and created additional opportunities to showcase member institutions throughout the year.
Video Courtesy of ACC Digital Network YouTube Channel
The years leading to 2019 therefore weren’t simply a countdown to opening night.
They were the construction of the operation behind it.
Launch Night Finally Arrives
At 7 p.m. Eastern on August 22, 2019, ACC Network officially went live.
Its launch programming introduced the network through studio coverage, conference personalities, original programming and previews of the upcoming season.
But the channel wasn’t starting from zero.
ACC Network Extra had existed since 2016.
Schools had spent years developing production capabilities.
ESPN had worked with campus staffs to prepare for live television.
Distribution agreements had been negotiated across multiple providers, with some negotiations continuing after launch.
August 22 was an important milestone.
But much of the business behind the network had already been built.
The Business Lessons Behind the Launch
The scale of the new operation became clearer once ACC Network arrived.
At launch, ESPN projected that ACC Network and ACC Network Extra would combine to carry approximately 1,350 events during the network’s first year.
Football and men’s basketball naturally remained important parts of the network, but that enormous inventory created room for much more.
Baseball.
Softball.
Women’s basketball.
Soccer.
Volleyball.
Lacrosse.
Field hockey.
Wrestling.
Swimming and diving.
Tennis.
And other ACC championship sports.
For universities, the network provided a year-round platform capable of showcasing far more of an athletic department than its highest-profile teams.
A Potential Recruiting Tool
Additional exposure could also become part of the recruiting conversation.
It would go too far to claim that ACC Network broadly improved recruiting throughout the conference without evidence demonstrating that outcome.
There is, however, evidence that schools recognized recruiting value in the infrastructure surrounding the network.
Around the time of the launch, Georgia Tech officials discussed how their new ACC Network production facility could assist recruiting in multiple ways.
The logic isn’t difficult to understand.
Prospective student-athletes and their families could see more competitions, while universities could point to their media facilities and the increased availability of their sports through ESPN platforms.
Rather than calling ACC Network a proven conference-wide recruiting advantage, it is more accurate to describe visibility and production capabilities as additional tools schools could incorporate into recruiting.
That distinction matters.
Build the System Before the Launch
The biggest business lesson from ACC Network may have little to do with television.
Organizations often concentrate their attention on launch day.
The ACC’s rollout demonstrates another approach.
Start building the system first.
The digital component began in 2016.
Campus production capabilities developed over several years.
Students and professional production staffs gained experience.
ESPN worked with universities in preparation for television production.
Programming was developed.
Distribution agreements were negotiated.
Then came August 22, 2019.
That sequence provides a useful framework for entrepreneurs and small businesses as well.
A new business doesn’t necessarily need to wait for the perfect website before demonstrating expertise.
A future podcast can begin developing an audience through written content.
A company preparing a new service can start educating potential customers about the problem that service will eventually solve.
A media organization planning a larger product can experiment with smaller forms of content first.
The scale may be completely different from ESPN and the ACC.
The principle isn’t.
The Long Game
The ACC Network officially launched on August 22, 2019.
But focusing only on that date misses the most interesting part of the story.
Three years earlier, the conference and ESPN had already begun the digital phase through ACC Network Extra.
Universities then spent years building production capabilities.
ESPN helped prepare campus personnel for the demands of the television network.
Meanwhile, the business of securing distribution continued right through launch and, in some cases, afterward.
None of that guarantees that every later success of ACC Network was caused by its pre-launch strategy.
That’s not the argument.
The more defensible—and more useful—lesson is that the ACC and ESPN did not wait until launch day to begin building the operation.
They developed infrastructure.
They created programming.
They accumulated production experience.
They established a digital presence.
And then they expanded that foundation into a 24-hour television network.
For businesses, that’s the lesson worth remembering.
The public may remember the day your product launches.
But the work that determines whether you’re prepared for that day usually happens long before anyone is watching.
The ACC Network played the long game.
And its business was being built years before the television network ever turned on.
Graphics created with AI-assisted design tools.
Visual concepts, editorial direction, composition, and final creative decisions were developed by Vallano Media.
How the Appalachian State Upset Gave the Big Ten Network an Unforgettable National Debut
By Cheval John | Vallano Media
This article was created with the assistance of artificial intelligence.
The final version was reviewed, edited and fact-checked by the author
Graphics created with AI-assisted design tools.
Visual concepts, editorial direction, composition, and final creative decisions were developed by Vallano Media.
Sometimes the biggest moments in business aren’t planned. They’re captured.
That is essentially what happened when the Big Ten Network officially launched on August 30, 2007.
The Big Ten had taken an unusual step for a college athletic conference.
Instead of relying exclusively on outside television partners to distribute its sports inventory, the conference became the majority owner of a national television network devoted to its universities.
BTN was created through a partnership between the Big Ten Conference and Fox Networks.
The idea was bigger than simply finding another place to televise football.
The network would create substantially more television opportunities across the conference, including football, men’s and women’s basketball and numerous Olympic sports.
It would also carry studio programming and other content connected to Big Ten universities.
The Big Ten Network officially went on the air at 8 p.m. eastern on August 30 with a special football preview edition of Big Ten Tonight.
The scope of the investment was apparent immediately.
During its inaugural season, BTN planned to televise 39 football games and 140 men’s basketball games.
At the time, both totals were more than any other television network.
The arrangement also guaranteed that every Big Ten home football and men’s basketball game would be televised by one of the conference’s television partners.
That was a significant departure from the traditional conference-media relationship.
The Big Ten was not eliminating outside television partners.
Instead, it was creating another piece of media infrastructure that it partly controlled.
That distinction matters.
Owning part of the platform meant the conference could create more inventory, showcase more of its universities and participate directly in the economics of the network.
Contemporary information from Michigan State Athletics described the Big Ten as BTN’s majority owner, with network proceeds divided equally among the conference’s then-11 member universities.
It was an ambitious strategy.
And two days after BTN launched, the new network received an introduction nobody could have scripted.
A Football Game That Looked Routine
On September 1, 2007, Michigan opened its season against Appalachian State at Michigan Stadium.
Michigan entered the game ranked No. 5 in the Associated Press poll.
Appalachian State was playing in the Football Championship Subdivision, then commonly known as Division I-AA, but the Mountaineers were hardly an ordinary lower-division opponent.
They had won consecutive FCS national championships in 2005 and 2006.
Still, beating Michigan in Ann Arbor seemed unlikely.
Then the game started.
Appalachian State built a 28–17 halftime lead before Michigan fought back.
The game remained undecided until the final seconds, when the Wolverines attempted a potential game-winning field goal.
Appalachian State blocked it.
Final score:
Appalachian State 34, Michigan 32.
Video Courtesy of the Big Ten Network YouTube Channel
The result immediately entered college football history.
According to the NCAA’s retrospective of the upset, no FCS team had defeated a team ranked in the Associated Press poll since 1989.
The victory was so significant that the AP subsequently changed its voting policy to allow FCS teams to receive votes in its college football poll.
For Appalachian State, it was a program-defining victory.
For Michigan, it was a stunning defeat.
And for a television network that had been on the air for barely two days, it was an extraordinary piece of live content.
BTN had not created the moment.
It had simply built the platform before the moment arrived.
The Game That Introduced a New Media Brand
The Appalachian State victory was already an extraordinary sports story.
Its timing made it an extraordinary media story as well.
BTN’s first college football Saturday featured six games, including four noon kickoffs airing simultaneously.
Appalachian State-Michigan appeared on BTN’s main channel, while the network also carried Youngstown State-Ohio State, Northeastern-Northwestern and Florida International-Penn State during the same window.
Indiana-Indiana State and Minnesota-Bowling Green followed in prime time.
Think about the timing.
The network had launched Thursday night.
By Saturday afternoon, one of the games on its schedule had become one of the biggest stories in American sports.
No marketing executive could guarantee something like that.
You can advertise a football game.
You can promote the teams.
You can create commercials explaining why people should watch your new network.
What you cannot manufacture is a two-time defending FCS national champion walking into Michigan Stadium and beating the fifth-ranked team in the country.
That’s where live sports become different from almost every other form of media.
The Value of the Unexpected
Television networks know what game they are buying.
They do not know what moment they are buying.
Most games eventually disappear into the historical record.
A few become part of the culture of the sport.
Appalachian State-Michigan became one of those games.
The blocked field goal, the celebration and the disbelief surrounding the result gave BTN something a newly launched network desperately needs: a memorable event associated with its brand.
That doesn’t mean Appalachian State made the Big Ten Network successful.
There is no credible way to establish that one game caused BTN’s eventual growth, and the network’s business model had been developed long before the Mountaineers arrived in Ann Arbor.
The more defensible conclusion is also the more interesting one: The upset gave a brand-new television network an extraordinary early showcase.
The Big Ten had invested in the infrastructure first.
Then history happened on that infrastructure.
Content Is Valuable. Distribution Matters Too.
The opening weekend also revealed another lesson that remains important in sports media today.
Great content does not automatically mean universal access.
BTN entered the market still needing to establish distribution across television providers.
Its creation meant the conference suddenly possessed significantly more programming inventory, but the business only worked if fans could actually receive the network.
That relationship between content and distribution has shaped sports television ever since.
A network can possess exclusive games, but those games also become leverage in negotiations with cable, satellite and, eventually, streaming distributors.
Fans generally do not care about the mechanics of carriage negotiations.
They care about watching their team.
And when a major game becomes unavailable to part of the audience, the distribution arrangement itself can become part of the sports conversation.
The Appalachian State upset provided an early demonstration of exactly why live sports could give a new network leverage: nobody knew in advance which game might become essential viewing.
More Than Football
BTN’s original programming commitment also shows why it would be a mistake to describe the network merely as a football experiment.
The inaugural schedule called for those 39 football games, but also 140 men’s basketball games, studio shows and extensive coverage of additional NCAA sports.
Contemporary BTN information emphasized hockey, baseball, volleyball, softball and other sports as part of the network’s nightly programming.
That was an important part of the business proposition.
Football could attract attention.
Basketball could provide another major audience.
But a conference network also created something traditional television schedules struggled to provide: year-round inventory.
Women’s sports, Olympic sports, campus programs and conference-specific shows could fill programming hours while simultaneously serving audiences whose teams previously had limited television exposure.
That is what made the platform potentially valuable beyond one unforgettable Saturday in Ann Arbor.
A Different Model for College Sports Media
BTN represented a significant shift in the relationship between a conference and television.
Instead of exclusively selling programming to outside networks and allowing those networks to determine how much conference content their schedules could accommodate, the Big Ten became an owner of a national network devoted to its own institutions.
The model did not eliminate traditional television partnerships.
It complemented them.
Years later, other conferences would pursue their own network strategies, though not always using exactly the same structure.
The SEC Network launched through a partnership with ESPN in 2014.
The ACC Network followed with ESPN in 2019.
Those networks belonged to a later generation of conference media strategy, but BTN had already demonstrated that conference-branded television could occupy a significant place in the national sports landscape.
The Appalachian State upset did not create that business model.
But during BTN’s first football weekend, it gave everyone watching a remarkably vivid example of why owning premium live sports inventory could matter.
The Business Legacy of Building Before the Breakthrough
Nearly two decades after Appalachian State walked into Michigan Stadium and produced its historic upset, BTN’s significance is much larger than one football game.
The network still exists.
More importantly, the underlying idea behind it has become ordinary enough that it is easy to forget how unusual it once seemed.
College conferences today think constantly about media inventory, distribution platforms, streaming, direct-to-consumer products and the value of controlling their content.
In 2007, the Big Ten was making a substantial bet on those ideas.
The conference and Fox had entered a long-term partnership to create what the Big Ten describes as the first conference-owned television network.
BTN launched August 30, 2007, and has since developed into a year-round operation producing thousands of live events across its platforms.
That makes the real business story much bigger than Appalachian State.
From Television Channel to Strategic Asset
BTN created value in several different ways.
First, it created additional programming opportunities.
Football and basketball games that might previously have competed for limited national or regional television windows gained another outlet.
Sports with smaller television audiences gained more consistent exposure.
Second, the network gave Big Ten universities a dedicated media environment.
Instead of appearing only when an outside broadcaster selected them, conference schools could exist within a year-round programming ecosystem.
Third, BTN turned media into an owned business asset rather than simply a rights agreement.
The Big Ten was the network’s majority owner, while Fox brought television expertise and distribution capabilities.
That structure aligned the conference directly with the success of the network.
And it offered a lesson that extends well beyond sports.
Sometimes the most valuable move is not merely creating content.
It is owning part of the system that distributes it.
Why Appalachian State Still Matters to This Story
If BTN’s long-term success was based on a much larger business strategy, why does the Appalachian State game matter?
Because it illustrates the value of preparation better than almost any spreadsheet could.
The Big Ten could not predict the upset.
It could not know that Appalachian State would lead at halftime.
It could not know Michigan would rally.
It could not know the game would come down to a final field-goal attempt.
And it certainly could not know that Appalachian State would block it.
But the conference had already done the part it could control.
The network existed.
The television rights were secured.
The production crews were there.
The cameras were running.
When the unpredictable moment arrived, BTN owned the platform on which that game was originally televised.
That distinction is important because business success often works the same way.
Build Before You Need It
Businesses sometimes wait for demand before building infrastructure.
Creators wait for an audience before developing a consistent publishing system.
Companies wait for the perfect opportunity before investing in the tools needed to capitalize on it.
But opportunity rarely announces itself far enough in advance to make preparation convenient.
The Big Ten Network offers the opposite lesson.
Build before the breakthrough.
The conference didn’t build BTN for Appalachian State-Michigan.
It built BTN because it believed Big Ten content had enough long-term value to justify its own television platform.
The upset became an unexpected demonstration of that belief.
Two days after launch, the network had something no marketing department could order: history.
The Best Marketing Campaign Nobody Planned
That brings us back to the title.
Appalachian State’s victory wasn’t literally a marketing campaign.
Nobody planned it.
Nobody scripted it.
And the Big Ten certainly would not have chosen one of its flagship programs losing to an FCS opponent as a promotional strategy.
That’s precisely what makes the story fascinating.
Marketing departments spend enormous amounts of time trying to manufacture memorable moments.
Live sports manufacture their own.
A new network simply has to be there when one happens.
BTN was there.
On September 1, 2007, Appalachian State made college football history by beating Michigan 34–32.
Two days earlier, the Big Ten had taken a very different kind of risk by putting its own network on the air.
One moment was completely unpredictable.
The other required years of planning.
Together, they produced one of the most remarkable opening weekends a sports network could have experienced.
And there is a business lesson buried inside that coincidence.
You cannot predict your biggest moment.
But you can build the platform that allows you to capture it when it arrives.
Graphics created with AI-assisted design tools.
Visual concepts, editorial direction, composition, and final creative decisions were developed by Vallano Media.
Why Smaller Local Media Still Plays the Biggest Role in Major College Sports
By Cheval John | Vallano Media
This article was created with the assistance of artificial intelligence.
The final version was reviewed, edited and fact-checked by the author
Graphics created with AI-assisted design tools.
Visual concepts, editorial direction, composition, and final creative decisions were developed by Vallano Media.
The Stories Behind the Spotlight
It’s Saturday morning in America.
Hours before ESPN’s College GameDay goes live and before millions of fans tune in to watch the day’s biggest matchups, another group of journalists has already been hard at work.
A beat reporter is putting the finishing touches on a story about an injured linebacker whose status could affect the outcome of today’s game.
A local television photographer is capturing the atmosphere as fans begin filling campus streets.
A sports radio host is interviewing former players about the history behind one of college football’s oldest rivalries.
Meanwhile, a reporter is reviewing notes from Friday’s practice, searching for the small details that only someone covering the program every day would notice.
By the time the national audience arrives, the people closest to the program have already spent the week telling its story.
When people think about major college sports coverage, they often picture the biggest names in broadcasting.
ESPN, FOX, CBS, NBC, and conference networks have transformed how fans experience college athletics, bringing games to millions of viewers every weekend.
Their broadcasts showcase elite competition, passionate fan bases, and unforgettable moments that have helped make college sports one of the most popular forms of entertainment in America.
Yet behind every nationally televised game is a story that almost always begins somewhere else.
It begins with local journalism.
The Foundation of Every Great Story
National broadcasters excel at covering the biggest moments.
Rivalry games, conference championships, the College Football Playoff, and the NCAA Tournament deserve the production quality and reach that only major networks can provide.
But those moments represent only a small part of the college athletics calendar.
Long before kickoff, local reporters are covering recruiting visits, spring practices, coaching staff changes, facility improvements, academic achievements, and athletic department meetings.
They are attending press conferences that receive little national attention, interviewing assistant coaches, and building relationships with players and administrators that develop over years rather than days.
By the time a program reaches the national spotlight, local journalists have often documented every step of the journey.
That perspective is difficult to replicate from a studio hundreds or even thousands of miles away.
College Sports Never Sleeps
One of the biggest misconceptions about college athletics is that coverage revolves around game days.
In reality, the work never stops.
Recruiting has become a year-round process. The transfer portal has created constant roster movement.
Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) opportunities have reshaped recruiting and athlete branding.
Conference realignment continues to redefine the landscape of college sports, while recent changes involving revenue sharing have added another layer of complexity for athletic departments.
Fans want to understand what these developments mean for their favorite teams—not just when the news breaks, but throughout the entire process.
That is where local media continues to provide tremendous value.
Beat reporters explain why a particular recruit matters, how a coaching hire fits a program’s long-term vision, or what a new athletic facility could mean for future recruiting success.
They provide context that extends far beyond the headlines.
National broadcasts may explain what happened.
Local journalism explains why it matters.
More Than a Game—A Community
College athletics is unique because it is deeply connected to the communities surrounding each campus.
A football Saturday in towns like Tuscaloosa, Alabama; Baton Rouge, Louisiana; or College Station, Texas, is more than a sporting event.
Hotels fill with visiting fans.
Restaurants experience some of their busiest weekends of the year.
Local retailers, transportation providers, and countless small businesses benefit from the economic activity generated by home games.
Universities and local tourism organizations have repeatedly documented the significant economic impact that college athletics has on their surrounding communities.
Local journalists understand these connections because they live in the communities they cover.
When a university announces plans for a stadium renovation or hires a new football coach, the story extends far beyond the playing field.
It affects local businesses, alumni, city leaders, and residents whose lives are closely tied to the university.
Those are stories that deserve more than a brief mention during a national broadcast.
They deserve reporters who understand the community firsthand.
Relationships Built Over Time
Perhaps the greatest advantage local media has is trust.
Many college beat reporters spend years—sometimes decades—covering the same university.
They watch freshmen become All-Americans, assistant coaches become head coaches, and championship teams become part of school history.
Over time, they earn the confidence of coaches, administrators, athletes, and fans alike.
That trust cannot be built overnight.
It comes from consistently showing up, asking thoughtful questions, verifying information, and understanding the traditions that define a program.
In an age where information spreads instantly across social media, credibility has become one of journalism’s most valuable assets.
Local media has earned that credibility one story at a time.
How Local Reporting Shapes the National Conversation
If there is one area where the importance of local media becomes impossible to ignore, it is recruiting.
For many fans, a recruit first appears when ESPN releases its rankings or when a commitment is announced live on television.
But by then, local journalists have often been following that athlete for years.
Long before a five-star prospect signs with a university, local newspapers, television stations, and regional sports websites are attending Friday night football games, interviewing high school coaches, talking with families, and documenting the athlete’s development.
By the time the rest of the country learns the player’s name, local media has already told much of the story.
That early reporting gives fans something far more valuable than a recruiting ranking.
It provides context.
Recruiting Is More Than Stars
Recruiting has changed dramatically over the last decade.
The transfer portal, NIL opportunities, and increased media attention have transformed recruiting into a year-round process.
Fans no longer wait until National Signing Day to learn about their team’s future.
They expect updates every week, sometimes every day.
Local beat reporters are uniquely positioned to provide those updates.
Rather than simply reporting that a player has committed, they explain why that athlete fits the team’s system, how the coaching staff built the relationship, and what position needs are being addressed.
One recent example is Arch Manning.
Years before he enrolled at the University of Texas, reporters in Louisiana and regional recruiting analysts had been covering his high school career, documenting his development, and following one of the most closely watched recruitments in modern college football.
By the time national television focused on his commitment, local and regional journalists had already built the foundation of that story.
That is the value of local journalism.
It doesn’t simply announce the news.
It explains the journey.
When Local Reporting Becomes National News
One of the biggest misconceptions in sports journalism is that the largest stories always originate with the largest media companies.
In reality, many of the most significant developments in college athletics begin with reporters covering a single university or conference.
Local journalists are often the first to uncover coaching searches, administrative changes, recruiting developments, facility projects, and conference discussions because they spend every day cultivating relationships with the people closest to those programs.
National media then expands those stories for a broader audience.
One of the clearest examples came during the dramatic conference realignment of 2021.
While covering Texas A&M at SEC Media Days, Brent Zwerneman, formerly of the Houston Chronicle reported that the University of Texas and the University of Oklahoma had contacted the Southeastern Conference about joining the league.
The report immediately sent shockwaves throughout college athletics because it suggested one of the biggest shifts in conference realignment history.
Within hours, national sports media had picked up the story.
Television networks interrupted programming to discuss the implications.
Sports talk radio devoted entire shows to the report.
Podcasts, websites, and social media platforms analyzed every possible outcome.
Days later, the conversation had expanded across the entire country before Texas and Oklahoma officially announced their move.
That sequence perfectly illustrates how local journalism often shapes the national conversation.
One reporter, covering a single beat, uncovered a story that changed the future of college athletics.
National media deservedly informed millions of fans.
But the story began with local reporting.
Partnership, Not Competition
It is easy to view local and national media as competitors.
I see them differently.
They perform different jobs.
Local reporters spend months or years developing sources, attending practices, covering university board meetings, and understanding the culture surrounding a program.
National broadcasters take those important developments and explain their significance to audiences across the country.
One cannot fully replace the other.
Instead, they complement one another.
Local journalism discovers and develops the story.
Regional media expands the discussion.
National media introduces it to millions of viewers.
Each serves an essential role within the sports media ecosystem.
Credibility Still Matters
Today’s media landscape moves at incredible speed.
Breaking news spreads across social media within minutes, sometimes before the facts have been fully confirmed.
That environment has increased the importance of trusted local journalists.
Experienced beat reporters understand the value of verification.
They know when to wait for confirmation instead of chasing rumors.
Over time, fans learn which reporters consistently provide accurate information and thoughtful analysis.
That credibility cannot be created by a larger television contract or a bigger social media following.
It is earned through years of careful reporting, accountability, and trust.
In many ways, trust has become local journalism’s greatest competitive advantage.
As college athletics continues to evolve through conference realignment, NIL, the transfer portal, and revenue sharing, fans need more than breaking news.
They need reporters who understand how those changes affect their university, their athletic department, and their community.
That is precisely where local media continues to make its greatest contribution.
Why Local Journalism’s Future Is Brighter Than Many Think
As technology continues to transform journalism, predictions about the decline of local media have become increasingly common.
The rise of digital platforms, social media, streaming services, and now artificial intelligence has led many to question whether local journalism can continue to play a meaningful role in covering major college sports.
I believe the opposite is true.
If anything, the rapid evolution of technology has made local journalism even more valuable.
Artificial intelligence can summarize press conferences, organize statistics, transcribe interviews, identify trends, and help journalists work more efficiently.
National broadcasters can produce world-class game coverage that reaches millions of viewers.
Social media can alert fans to breaking news within seconds.
But none of those innovations can replace one of journalism’s most valuable assets.
Relationships.
Technology Changes. Trust Doesn’t.
Throughout history, journalism has adapted to every major technological advancement.
Radio expanded the reach of newspapers.
Television changed how sports were consumed.
The internet transformed how quickly stories could be published.
Social media accelerated the speed at which news traveled.
Now, artificial intelligence is reshaping how journalists research, organize information, and produce content.
Each innovation has changed the profession, but none has eliminated the need for trusted reporting.
Fans still want journalists who understand their university.
They want reporters who know the history behind a rivalry, recognize why a coaching change matters beyond the win-loss record, and understand how a decision made inside an athletic department affects an entire community.
That kind of knowledge cannot be generated by technology alone.
It is built through years of reporting.
AI Should Enhance Journalism—Not Replace It
Artificial intelligence has the potential to become one of the most valuable tools ever introduced into a newsroom.
It can help reporters analyze data more quickly, organize research, improve workflows, and spend less time on repetitive tasks.
That creates more opportunities for journalists to focus on what matters most—reporting.
AI cannot build trust with a coach over ten seasons.
It cannot recognize the emotion inside a locker room after a heartbreaking loss.
It cannot spend years earning the confidence of athletic directors, assistant coaches, university officials, and student-athletes.
Those relationships remain uniquely human.
The future of journalism will not belong solely to organizations that adopt AI.
It will belong to organizations that successfully combine technological innovation with trusted local reporting.
That combination has the potential to strengthen journalism rather than diminish it.
The Business Lesson Beyond Sports
There is another lesson hidden within local sports journalism that extends far beyond college athletics.
Many businesses believe success comes from reaching the largest possible audience.
Local media demonstrates a different strategy.
It succeeds by deeply understanding a specific audience.
A beat reporter covering one university often knows more about that program than someone responsible for covering an entire conference or the national landscape.
That expertise builds loyalty.
Readers return because they trust the reporting.
Listeners tune in because they know the discussion will include details unavailable elsewhere.
Advertisers invest because they know the audience is engaged.
The same principle applies across industries.
Whether a company sells software, operates a restaurant, provides financial services, or publishes sports journalism, long-term success often comes from becoming indispensable to a well-defined audience instead of trying to appeal to everyone.
It is a business strategy built on specialization, consistency, and trust.
Why Community Will Always Matter
College athletics has always been about more than championships.
It is about tradition.
Families pass season tickets from one generation to the next.
Former students travel hundreds of miles to return for homecoming weekends.
Communities rally around student-athletes who represent more than themselves.
Local journalists preserve those stories.
They document coaching eras, championship seasons, unforgettable rivalries, and the people whose contributions might otherwise be forgotten.
National television captures the biggest moments.
Local journalism preserves the history behind them.
That is not likely to change.
Video Courtesy of Rebel Walk YouTube Channel
Final Thoughts
Every Saturday, millions of fans enjoy nationally televised college football games.
They see packed stadiums.
Electric atmospheres.
Championship-caliber athletes.
Expert analysis.
What they often do not see are the months—and sometimes years—of reporting that made those broadcasts meaningful.
The stories behind recruiting classes.
The coaching hires.
The facility improvements.
The conference realignment discussions.
The community traditions.
The student-athletes whose journeys began long before they appeared on national television.
Those stories are usually told first by local journalists.
National broadcasters deserve tremendous credit for bringing college sports to audiences across the country and around the world.
Their coverage has elevated the visibility of college athletics and created unforgettable moments for generations of fans.
But local media provides something equally valuable.
It provides context.
It provides continuity.
It provides credibility.
Most importantly, it provides community.
As college athletics enters a future shaped by streaming platforms, conference realignment, NIL, revenue sharing, and artificial intelligence, the organizations that thrive will not simply be those with the biggest budgets or the largest audiences.
They will be the ones that continue earning trust by knowing their communities better than anyone else.
The story of Brent Zwerneman’s report on Texas and Oklahoma’s move toward the SEC serves as a lasting reminder of that truth.
One beat reporter covering a single assignment helped shape one of the biggest stories in modern college sports.
National networks carried the story to millions, but the first chapter belonged to local journalism.
In the end, the biggest role in major college sports is not always played under the brightest lights.
More often than not, it begins in a local newsroom, with a reporter who understands that every national headline starts as a hometown story.
Graphics created with AI-assisted design tools.
Visual concepts, editorial direction, composition, and final creative decisions were developed by Vallano Media.
Sources and Further Reading
Official NCAA information explaining NIL policies and guidance.
Official NCAA overview of transfer rules and the transfer portal.
Independent research and policy analysis focused on the future of college athletics.
The Columbus Dispatch – Ohio State Sports — Comprehensive local reporting on Ohio State athletics.
The Advocate – LSU Sports — Local reporting on Louisiana State University athletics.
Podcast Anniversary Milestone Worth The Wait
By Cheval John
February 7th, 2018
Today’s episode of What’s The Word? featuring Kate Frappell, Design Lead at ManageFlitter is a very special show.
Kate is also the co-host of It’s A Monkey Podcast and is the producer of the popular twitter chat, #socialroi, hosted by Madalyn Sklar.
This episode marks the fifth year anniversary when I started the podcast on this very day.
I basically used my cell phone to host the show because I felt at that time I did not have the resources to spend on a microphone or editing type of equipment that goes into podcasting.
The platform I still use to this day to launch this show, blogtalkradio, made it simple for non-tech people like me to schedule the show and allow me and the guest to dial into the platform.
From there, the show goes live as an online radio show and then they process the interview and turn it into a podcast feed to distribute to iTunes (now apple podcasts), stitcher and google play music.
I honestly had planned to start the podcast in january after I had created the account with blogtalkradio.
However, the guest basically changed her mind and let me know she could not be a part of the podcast.
This taught me a lesson which I basically would recommend to anyone who is thinking about starting a podcast.
Never ask someone outside of the people you know very well to be a guest on your show if you are just starting out with a podcast.
Most of the time, the outside people will be nervous because they do not know what to expect if you are launching a podcast for the first time.
It is much better to have a track record of your show when you are pitching to most of the big name people because they want to make sure that your podcast fits their business or their brand.
My first guest was a professor at Sam Houston State University (SHSU), who had served in the white house during the ford and reagan administration.
I will admit that a bit of miscommunication led to a shaky start in the early going of the show.
But when the guest arrived, the show went well and had over a 1,000 downloads to my surprise.
In the first year and a half of hosting the show, the majority of my guests were professors and college coaches from S.H.S.U.
From there, the guest became more diverse due to the fact that publicist were reaching out to me to interview their clients and even from building long term friendships on social media.
Then the live stream revolution changed the direction in how I host the show.
Meerkat was launched in february of 2015 and was introduced at South by Southwest the following month of the same year.
Ironically, Periscope was launched in March of that same year and became an “instant hit” with consumers.
The live video platform, blab, was launched around mid-summer of 2015.
This app was the first to host entirely on computer and not on smartphones which gave people like me who did not own phones with apps at that time to participate in the live streaming revolution.
It also had the ability to record the live stream which would be saved as an mp4 video and a mp3 audio which made it easy for me to upload to blogtalkradio.
This also made me realized that I would need a quality microphone to make the live stream work.
So I bought my first microphone and jump right in the live streaming revolution.
As the saying goes, social media changes in an instant.
And that is what happened to the live streaming apps.
Meerkat disappeared within a year and blab basically disappeared in that same time frame.
While Periscope later integrated with Twitter and Facebook Live was officially launched in early 2016.
What is interesting to note is that the smart video companies have pivoted their services to be as compatible with the bigger social media platforms which are dominating the live streaming revolution.
Platforms like Zoom and Blue Jeans Network, which has been in business for years before the live streaming revolution, integrated their platform with the likes of YouTube Live and Facebook Live.
So now I am recording all of my podcast using facebook live via blue jeans network and today’s episode is part of it.
In this episode, you will hear:
-how Kate decided to become a designer
-how she became the lead designer for ManageFlitter
-what inspired Kate to live in Canada for an extended period of time
-the importance of live streaming
-why businesses should embrace social media
This episode was recorded on Facebook Live via Blue Jeans Network in January of this year before ManageFlitter’s one year anniversary of hosting the #socialroi chat.
Snippet on Vallano Media TV
Full Episode on BlogTalkRadio
Website: www.katefrappell.com
Twitter: @katefrappell
Quotes from Kate Frappell on:
STARTING THE #SOCIALROI TWITTER CHAT
I think mainly we just wanted to get the manageflitter name out there and better build relationships with our customers and our audience.
From our point of view, get inside the minds and find out what products they are using, how they are using them, why they like certain things and learn from them so that we can implement it into the internet social as well.
It’s been really good.
When I first started, I was like, “Oh, I’m not sure this twitter chat thing is all about” and now, I really like it.
I think they’re great.
I’ve met a lot of great people through twitter and joined all sorts of different twitter chats and had opportunities like this to talk on podcasts.
It’s been really good.
Great exposure as well.
That’s sort of the journey for #socialroi.
BUSINESSES HOSTING OR PARTICIPATING IN TWITTER CHATS
Twitter chats are an opportunity to log in and chat with other like-minded people or people who know more than you.
If you are an entrepreneur and you want to learn about, let’s say, social media marketing, you could jump on the #socialroi chat and find out how you can improve your return on investment using social media.
Everybody in the chat talking about the same thing.
We have different topics every week and you can just learn so much as an individual or as a small business.
You can meet people who give you business opportunities.
It’s sort of a never-ending cycle.
I think it’s really worth putting the time into networking.
From a personal point of view, I mean a lot of entrepreneurs starting out are very busy and there is a lot of networking events that you physically have to attend.
But for a twitter chat, you just have to log in.
You do not have to even leave your desk.
I think it’s fantastic.
LIVE STREAMING
I think it’s still growing to be honest.
I do watch some live streams, but they are not the first thing I go and look at.
If I log into facebook, I’m sort of just scrolling through my newsfeed as I am used to.
But, I will click on the occasional live stream and they end up being very valuable.
So I think it’s just a matter of time before people kind of adopt and get use to watching these live videos and understanding who’s behind the businesses that are hosting them.
I think I read recently that 80% of people would rather watch a video than read something, especially people on social media.
I think it’s gonna be good.
I think it’s really going to take off.
The other thing as well is it’s evergreen.
For example, even if someone’s not watching this video right now, it’s going to be on your facebook page and people can come back and watch it at any time.
PODCASTS
Podcasting is becoming more popular definitely.
Even if you look now at the amount of softwares that are out there to help with podcasting.
One of the big problems we have with the monkey podcast is not getting enough analytics.
The fact that Apple is actually building this software to look into the analytics of podcast listeners is saying a lot like where podcast is going, how popular it is, why people are listen to it.
Business people and entrepreneurs are going to need it if they are going to take on podcasting.
It has a lot of potential especially with mobile devices now.
It’s nice to listen to something other than music sometimes.
WORKING REMOTELY
We use slack internally.
That makes it super easy to message each other.
Slack made a huge difference in opening that communication online.
Plus, the time zone is not terrible.
9 a.m. in Sydney, Australia is about 2 p.m. pacific time here in the west coast of Canada.
So I have the morning by myself and then the afternoon, everybody is online.
It’s basically like working in Sydney, Australia in the afternoon.
It’s been really good.
Twitter obviously helps as well.
Everybody is on twitter quite a bit because the whole product surrounds twitter.
I would say that there’s e-mails as well and a little bit of skype.
Really, I just have to credit slack.
ON MOVING TO CANADA
What led me to come over here was I’ve always really liked Canada for some reason.
My aunt would give me travel guides to Canada for Christmas.
In 2015, I did a lot of traveling to New York, East Coast Canada, West Coast Canada and Alaska before going back home.
I got a taste of the different parts of Canada and most of the highlights which is sort of the nature of the bus tours.
I really like the west coast of Canada and knew I wanted to come back here.
I kept working and saved money.
Then I was like, “You know what, I really want to go and live there.”
I applied for my visa and I got it.
I had a chat with Kevin (Garber), who is the boss of Manage Flitter and he thought about it for a bit and said, “Look, we rather you keep the job and work remotely than quit.”
I said, “Thank you.”
I really like the team.
It worked out really well.
That’s how I ended up here.
BUSINESS OWNERS OR EMPLOYEES WORKING REMOTELY
I would recommend it in the sense.
If you have not worked remotely before, it’s a whole new adventure.
Make sure you put the time into your day and have the discipline to work, but also have the discipline to switch off because you can just stretch your work day out forever.
I’m finding a good balance and the flexibility is amazing.
So sometimes, if I want to do something fun in the morning, I can and then I can start my day a little bit later and I’ll be online when everyone in Australia is online and I can work a little bit late into the night to make up for that.
It’s a huge learning curve from a working career perspective.
If you go to a new place, it’s a whole new culture to learn.
You make a lot of new friends.
You have to put yourself out there.
It sort of pushes you outside of your comfort zone which is really important I think.
Who would you like to be a guest on What’s The Word? in the future? You can leave your comment below.
How Fifteen Years of Winning Prepared Sam Houston for the Biggest Leap in School History
By Cheval John | Vallano Media
This article was created with the assistance of artificial intelligence.
The final version was reviewed, edited and fact-checked by the author
Graphics created with AI-assisted design tools.
Visual concepts, editorial direction, composition, and final creative decisions were developed by Vallano Media.
When Sam Houston State University officially joined Conference USA and the Football Bowl Subdivision (FBS) on July 1, 2023, it marked one of the most significant milestones in the university’s athletic history.
To some observers, the move may have appeared to happen quickly.
In reality, it was anything but.
Sam Houston’s transition from the Football Championship Subdivision (FCS) to the FBS came after roughly 15 years in which the university accumulated conference championships, national postseason appearances, two NCAA national championships and increased exposure through athletics.
That distinction matters.
It would be easy to look backward and say all of those accomplishments caused Sam Houston’s eventual move to Conference USA.
The available evidence doesn’t establish such a simple cause-and-effect relationship.
What the historical record does show is that when conference realignment accelerated in 2021, Sam Houston entered that changing landscape with years of demonstrated athletic success behind it.
And remarkably, years before many of those accomplishments occurred, university leadership was already talking about the relationship between athletic competition and institutional visibility.
A Vision Before the Victories
In the Fall 2008 edition of Sam Houston State’s Heritage magazine, then-university president Dr. James F. Gaertner, himself a Sam Houston alumnus, reflected on what competing against strong opponents could mean for the university:
“While we have not always fared as well as we would have liked in those contests, we have always competed well, earning the respect of our opponents and their fans. More importantly, when we compete against the best, it raises the visibility and, yes, the perception of our university.”
Gaertner also pointed to an accomplishment that showed Sam Houston’s athletic success already extended beyond one or two programs:
“Our university’s teams have won an unprecedented three consecutive Southland Conference Commissioner’s Cups, which is awarded to the best overall athletic program. Doing well in two or three sports will not win a cup. You must excel across the board.”
Those comments provide an important starting point for understanding what followed.
At the time, Sam Houston had not yet reached back-to-back FCS national championship games, captured its first NCAA Division I national championship in women’s bowling, won the NCAA Division I FCS Football National Championship, or begun its transition toward Conference USA and the FBS.
But the connection Gaertner described between athletic competition and university visibility would become increasingly apparent during the years ahead.
Football Takes Sam Houston to a Larger Audience
One of the biggest breakthroughs came in football.
Under head coach Willie Fritz, Sam Houston developed into one of the premier programs in the FCS.
In 2011, the Bearkats produced a 14–1 season and advanced to the NCAA Division I FCS National Championship Game.
The increased exposure wasn’t merely theoretical.
Sam Houston Athletics later noted that the 2011 season produced seven regional and national television appearances and brought nationwide media attention to the football program.
That provided a tangible example of the connection Gaertner had discussed three years earlier.
Competing successfully on a larger stage could introduce Sam Houston to audiences far beyond Huntsville.
And the Bearkats weren’t finished.
In 2012, Sam Houston returned to the FCS National Championship Game for a second consecutive season.
Although the Bearkats did not win either championship game, reaching the final in consecutive years demonstrated that 2011 had not been an isolated breakthrough.
Sam Houston had established itself as a recurring national contender at the FCS level.
Success Beyond Football
Football provided some of the university’s most visible moments, but the larger story was never exclusively about football.
Baseball became a consistent Southland Conference contender, competing for conference championships and NCAA postseason opportunities while developing players who would be selected in the Major League Baseball Draft.
Other programs contributed to Sam Houston’s conference success as well.
That matters when looking back at Gaertner’s 2008 comments.
His argument wasn’t that one successful football program would transform the university.
He specifically highlighted the importance of succeeding “across the board.”
The three consecutive Southland Commissioner’s Cups he referenced provided measurable evidence that Sam Houston had already begun establishing that type of all-sports success.
Success Survives a Coaching Change
Another important test arrived after the 2013 football season when Willie Fritz departed.
Sam Houston hired K.C. Keeler, who had previously led Delaware to an FCS national championship.
The coaching change could have marked the end of one successful era.
Instead, the Bearkats continued winning.
That continuity became another important part of the story.
Sam Houston’s football success was no longer tied exclusively to one coach or one exceptional group of players.
The program had developed expectations and infrastructure capable of carrying success from one coaching era into another.
By the middle of the 2010s, Sam Houston had established itself as one of the Southland Conference’s most consistently successful all-sports programs, while football had become a recurring presence on the national FCS stage.
The foundation had been built.
Soon, Sam Houston would celebrate two NCAA national championships—the 2014 NCAA Division I Women’s Bowling National Championship, the first NCAA Division I national championship in school history, and the 2020 NCAA Division I FCS Football National Championship, played in the spring of 2021.
Those championships would become two of the defining milestones in Sam Houston’s remarkable athletic rise.
By the middle of the 2010s, years of conference success and national football appearances had already changed Sam Houston’s athletic profile.
Then the Bearkats began winning on an even bigger stage.
The Championship That Changed the University’s History
Before football reached the top of the FCS, another Bearkat program made university history.
In 2014, the Sam Houston State women’s bowling team defeated defending national champion Nebraska, 4–2, to capture the NCAA Division I Women’s Bowling National Championship.
It was more than another trophy.
It was the first NCAA Division I national championship in any sport in Sam Houston State history.
The achievement was even more remarkable considering how young the program was.
Women’s bowling was only in its fourth season, yet under head coach Brad Hagen, Sam Houston had already reached the pinnacle of NCAA competition in the sport.
The championship also provided another example of why Sam Houston’s athletic rise shouldn’t be told exclusively through football.
Six years earlier, Gaertner had emphasized that true all-sports success required excellence “across the board.”
Now a program outside football had delivered the university’s first NCAA Division I national championship.
Football Keeps Building
Meanwhile, K.C. Keeler continued building upon the football foundation he inherited.
Sam Houston remained a regular presence in the FCS postseason during much of the remainder of the decade, including deep playoff runs.
The standard had changed considerably from where the program had been years earlier.
Making the playoffs was no longer necessarily the defining accomplishment.
Sam Houston had already played for national championships.
Winning one remained the unfinished goal.
The Championship Gauntlet
Then came one of the most unusual seasons in college football history.
Because of the “COVID-19 pandemic”, the 2020 FCS season was played primarily during the spring of 2021.
Sam Houston finished its regular-season schedule 6–0.
Then came the playoffs.
And calling the path a gauntlet isn’t much of an exaggeration.
Sam Houston defeated Monmouth 21–15 in the opening round.
Next came North Dakota State, the dominant FCS program of the preceding decade.
Sam Houston defeated the Bison 24–20.
In the semifinals, the Bearkats faced No. 1 James Madison and survived another battle, 38–35.
That left No. 2 South Dakota State standing between Sam Houston and the championship it had pursued for years.
By the time the Bearkats reached the national championship game, they were 9–0.
One more victory would complete a perfect season.
Sixteen Seconds from History
The championship game delivered one final test.
Sam Houston trailed South Dakota State 21–17 late in the fourth quarter.
Quarterback Eric Schmid then directed a 16-play, 65-yard drive, keeping the season alive through two crucial fourth-down conversions.
With 16 seconds remaining, Schmid connected with Ife Adeyi for a 10-yard touchdown.
Sam Houston led 23–21.
The Bearkats held on.
Video Courtesy of NCAA YouTube Channel
After a 6–0 regular season and four consecutive playoff victories, Sam Houston finished 10–0 overall and captured the 2020 NCAA Division I FCS Football National Championship, played in spring 2021.
A decade earlier, the Bearkats had twice reached the championship game without winning it.
Now they had reached the summit.
A Résumé Built Over Time
By the end of that championship season, the progression was difficult to miss.
Sam Houston had reached the FCS National Championship Game in 2011 and 2012.
Women’s bowling had captured the university’s first NCAA Division I national championship in 2014.
Football had now completed an undefeated 10–0 national championship season.
Those accomplishments did more than fill trophy cases.
They gave Sam Houston a documented record of sustained athletic success.
When conference realignment accelerated in 2021, the Bearkats entered that changing landscape with back-to-back FCS championship game appearances, an NCAA women’s bowling national championship, an undefeated FCS football national championship season, and years of conference success behind them.
We don’t need to claim those achievements caused what happened next.
The chronology is compelling enough on its own.
The next chapter had arrived.
From FCS Champion to the Football Bowl Subdivision
In November 2021, Conference USA announced the addition of Sam Houston along with Jacksonville State, Liberty and New Mexico State.
For Sam Houston, the announcement represented another major change in an athletic journey that had already produced conference championships, national postseason runs and two NCAA national championships.
It is tempting to connect those dots too neatly and say all that winning earned Sam Houston its Conference USA invitation.
The public evidence doesn’t allow us to make that causal claim with certainty.
What we can say is more concrete.
When Conference USA added Sam Houston, the university brought with it a documented record of conference and national athletic success.
On July 1, 2023, Sam Houston officially became a Conference USA member.
The Bearkats were entering the Football Bowl Subdivision.
A Different Kind of Challenge
Moving from the FCS to the FBS meant more than changing the opponents on a football schedule.
The transition brought different scholarship requirements, greater financial demands, expanded travel and recruiting challenges, and competition against programs accustomed to operating at the FBS level.
Success at the previous level guaranteed nothing.
Sam Houston would have to build again.
That is an important part of this story because organizational growth rarely follows a straight line.
Reaching a larger stage doesn’t mean the work that got you there suddenly becomes unnecessary.
Usually, it means the opposite.
The expectations become greater.
The Bigger Story Was Always More Than Football
Football inevitably dominates much of the conversation surrounding an FBS transition.
But looking at Sam Houston’s previous 15 years exclusively through football would miss one of the most interesting parts of the story.
The evidence of athletic success existed across the department.
The Southland Commissioner’s Cups cited by Gaertner in 2008 reflected all-sports performance.
Baseball built its own record of conference and postseason success.
Women’s bowling delivered the university’s first NCAA Division I national championship.
Football reached two national championship games before eventually winning one.
Different programs contributed different pieces to the same institutional story.
That makes Gaertner’s 2008 observation particularly interesting in hindsight.
“You must excel across the board.”
More than a decade later, Sam Houston entered a new athletic era with evidence that it had done exactly that at various points along the way.
The Business Lesson: Build Before You Need the Opportunity
This is where Sam Houston’s story becomes useful beyond college sports.
Businesses often think about growth in terms of the opportunity itself.
Landing the major client.
Entering the new market.
Getting the big partnership.
Moving onto the larger platform.
But those moments usually expose what an organization has already built.
Sam Houston’s history provides a useful case study in preparation.
Long before Conference USA announced the Bearkats as a future member, Sam Houston had been building programs, hiring coaches, competing for championships, appearing on television and developing an athletic identity.
None of that guarantees a particular future opportunity.
That’s an important distinction.
But it does mean that when circumstances change, an organization with a strong foundation is in a very different position from one trying to build everything after the opportunity arrives.
That is the business lesson worth taking from Sam Houston.
Preparation doesn’t guarantee opportunity. It creates readiness for opportunity.
Final Thoughts
Sam Houston’s rise wasn’t one breakthrough.
It was a series of them.
Some happened on football fields.
One happened on bowling lanes.
Others happened quietly through conference championships, recruiting, coaching, administration and the daily work required to sustain athletic programs over many years.
That’s why the move to the FBS makes more sense when viewed through the previous decade and a half rather than through 2021 alone.
The national football championship was an extraordinary moment.
But it wasn’t the whole story.
Neither was the bowling championship.
Neither were the 2011 and 2012 football teams.
Together, however, those accomplishments document an athletic department that kept building, competing and finding ways to succeed as college athletics changed around it.
And that leaves a business lesson considerably stronger than simply saying winning leads to bigger opportunities.
It doesn’t always.
Preparation doesn’t guarantee that the door will open.
But when it does, years of preparation can determine whether you’re ready to walk through it.
Graphics created with AI-assisted design tools.
Visual concepts, editorial direction, composition, and final creative decisions were developed by Vallano Media.
Share this: